Japanese American author received offer to license her book but only if she agreed to censor the word "racism" from her author's note
Maggie Tokuda-Hall is Japanese American and the author of Love in the Library. It’s a picture book based on the true events of her grandparent’s love story while they were cruelly imprisoned at Minidoka, a concentration camp for Japanese Americans.
Maggie says she received an offer from Scholastic to license her book but with the condition that she censor the word “racism.” The following screenshots show the edits she says Scholastic requested she make.
She’s now going public with her experience via a blog post on her website.
“They wanted to take this book and repackage it so that it was just a simple love story. Nothing more. Not anything that might offend those book banners in what they called this “politically sensitive” moment. The irony of curating a collection tentatively titled ‘Rising Voices: Amplifying AANHPI Narratives’ with one hand while demanding that I strangle my own voice with the other was, to me, the perfect encapsulation of what publishing, our dubious white ally, does so often to marginalized creators. They want the credibility of our identities, want to market our biographies. They want to sell our suffering, smoothed down and made palatable to the white readers they prioritize. To assuage white guilt with stories that promise to make them better people, while never threatening them, not even with discomfort. They have no investment in our voices. Always, our voices are the first sacrifice at the altar of marketability.”
In her response to Scholastic, Maggie wrote, “It’s a deeply offensive offer. It’s a deeply offensive and particular edit. To say yes, we’d like to sell your grandparent’s story but not in a way that connects them to the suffering of those just like them now for fear of potential bans is, to put it lightly, cowardly. They will not have the right to sell this story because they’ve proven to me that they’re not up to the responsibility of it. Nor do they have the right to tell me and people like me that our family’s stories must stay in the past where they’re deemed no longer political.”
OK. No more subtweeting. This is what happened. Full story at the link.
— maggie tokuda-hall (@emteehall) April 12, 2023
I'm so disappointed and furious and unsurprised. But I also have receipts.
Scholastic wanted to feature my book, but ONLY if I censored the word RACISM from the author's note. https://t.co/Ge0HwiGUFK https://t.co/QPHAo7nROV pic.twitter.com/RDtORlTndl
This is one of those times where I had to step back for a moment because there's so much to unpack. I imagine Scholastic is afraid the word "racism" will draw the CRT vultures. I hope it does. 1/x https://t.co/0FjAwoBlnm
— Jamie Ford (@JamieFord) April 13, 2023
As a @Scholastic author, I find this so deeply upsetting. When we refuse to call racism by its name, we are lying to children. There's nothing educational or inspirational about that. https://t.co/j7Dc2oeWkZ
— katemessner (@KateMessner) April 12, 2023
Scholastic’s school market divisions (Clubs, Fairs, Education) have HUGE influence on what kids read. These divisions are also incredibly conservative. They aren’t caving to the book banners. They ARE the book banners. https://t.co/B8la2EHj3E
— Léonicka (@leonicka) April 13, 2023
Librarians and teachers: Pay attention to this. @Scholastic asked an author to take out a note that contextualizes her story (THE TRUE STORY OF HER GRANDPARENTS). Not for inclusion in the book fair market. But literally for an AANHPI specific initiative. https://t.co/pVdCXEszv0
— Angie Manfredi (@misskubelik) April 12, 2023
Let me say, as a Scholastic author, this is absurd and unacceptable. While this offensive, intellectually and morally bankrupt move came from a different division than my books are with, I hope everyone in Scholastic editorial speaks out in a chorus of voices against this. https://t.co/YlyLEEJybU
— Alex London (@ca_london) April 12, 2023
The question is always the same for all of us: " How can I do better?"
— Linda Sue Park SAYGAY (@LindaSuePark) April 12, 2023
Clearly, a whole bunch of folks failed to ask themseves that question here. Or worse, don't even care.@Scholastic https://t.co/gVyAZsYzXy
Scholastic at it again... This is so disrespectful. Big ups to Maggie for not letting them sanitize the reality we live in. Racism is and has always been real in this country. And it's BULLSHIT that these "leaders in education" will actively try to erase that truth. https://t.co/IhY7rtWcuE
— Steenz! (@oheysteenz) April 12, 2023
This is egregious. And a reminder that book bans and academic censorship laws in states like FL don't just affect people in FL.
— Tiffany C. Li (@tiffanycli) April 12, 2023
Politicians like DeSantis are trying to erase history. Corporations like Scholastic and the College Board are spreading this censorship nationwide. https://t.co/8lp6Tu4Z8L